K–12
Math + ELA
HIGH-IMPACT VIRTUAL TUTORING
Cignition brings live tutors, purpose-built math and ELA instruction, useful data, and hands-on implementation support together in one connected program, configured around the students, schedule, and priorities.
Math + ELA
Virtual instruction
Small groups of 2–4
Tutor + group
A strong program makes the work before, around, and after each session explicit. The five stages below show how an initial need becomes a supported implementation, and how the experience informs what happens next.
HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS
Open each step to see the distinct job it performs in the program lifecycle.
Be clear about the need tutoring is meant to address.
The work starts by identifying the learners, academic priorities, and local context the program needs to respond to. That creates a useful definition of success before schedules and rosters take over the conversation.
Build an operating plan the school can actually sustain.
Session length, frequency, group size, scheduling, and on-site support are planned together. The goal is a model that gives students a realistic path to consistent participation and the intended dosage.
Turn the plan into groups, access, and a ready first session.
Cignition translates the agreed model into rosters, access, an instructional starting point, and a coordinated first-session plan.
Keep implementation barriers from becoming the program.
Once sessions begin, the work shifts to follow-through. Cignition and the partner stay connected around attendance, access, communication, and emerging issues so practical changes can happen while they still matter.
Use the full implementation story to plan what comes next.
Scheduled reviews bring the partner and Cignition back to the original purpose. Together, the teams consider what students experienced, whether the model operated as intended, and what should continue or change.
DATA WITH A JOB TO DO
Data-informed instruction and implementation help the team respond while a program is underway. Data-driven continuous improvement helps Cignition and its partners learn across the full program.
A RESPONSIBLE EVIDENCE STORY
Independent randomized studies found statistically significant learning gains in specific fifth-grade fractions programs using Cignition’s one-to-one and small-group tutoring models. Those findings are an important part of our evidence base, alongside case studies and implementation data from real programs.
We use each source for what it can tell us: research to test specific questions, program data to track implementation and student progress, and partner context to understand what the numbers do and do not mean.
MTSS INTEGRATION
Cignition does not replace a school’s MTSS, core instruction, or local intervention team. It adds instructional capacity to address an identified need within the system the school already leads.
Core instruction and the school's intervention system remain central.
Educators and local teams have the most complete view of student needs, classroom priorities, and the supports already in place.
Tutoring takes on a specific, bounded instructional role.
Cignition adds recurring small-group time and focused math or ELA instruction for the learners and needs the partner identifies.
Shared visibility helps the larger system respond.
Program signals add context for local review. School teams retain responsibility for decisions across tiers, services, and the student’s broader plan.
WHAT STRONG IMPLEMENTATION ASKS
We do not treat every implementation as interchangeable. A strong program depends on clear roles, protected time, and ongoing communication from both sides.
Special Education Specialist
Rancho Santa Fe School District, CA
Assistant Superintendent, Technology & Innovation
Lynwood Unified School District, CA
Social Studies Concurrent Enrollment Teacher
Viewmont High School, UT
Senior Director
ACT Center for Equity in Learning
Professor and Director
Stanford University and NSSA
Principal Consultant and Owner
OMT Consulting
Director of MTSS
Antelope Valley Union High School District, CA
MTSS Coordinator
Rapides Parish Schools, LA
PROGRAM QUESTIONS
Clear answers for school and district leaders evaluating a virtual tutoring partner.
No. Cignition offers live virtual K–12 math and ELA tutoring, but the operating model is configured with each partner. Students served, schedule, group size, session frequency, local requirements, and reporting needs can shape the final design.
Programs can be scheduled during the school day, in an intervention block, or outside regular instructional hours when the partner can protect recurring time and provide the access students need. The strongest schedule is the one students can attend consistently.
Not necessarily. Cignition can use the academic and contextual information a partner can appropriately share, along with student responses and program evidence gathered during implementation. Standardized test data can add context when available.
Test preparation is not Cignition’s primary model. The program focuses on students’ identified math and ELA learning needs and can align instruction to relevant grade-level standards and academic priorities.
Schools implement virtual tutoring by agreeing on the students to serve, instructional priorities, recurring schedule, groups, technology access, and staff responsibilities before launch. Cignition provides tutors, curriculum, program management, and instructional support; school partners protect tutoring time, coordinate student access, and follow up on participation. During the program, both teams review attendance, contact hours, engagement, and academic progress to decide what needs adjusting. The operating plan should fit each school’s context.
A tutoring schedule alone does not ensure students receive the intended instruction. Missed sessions, access problems, limited time in tutoring, and low participation can reduce the opportunity to learn. Teams should also check whether the instructional focus matches student needs and whether local responsibilities are clear. Cignition’s program reports examine academic results alongside attendance, contact hours, and engagement. Those relationships help identify questions for improvement; they do not establish that any one factor caused an outcome.
Districts measure tutoring results by defining the learning goal, reviewing academic progress, and checking how the program was implemented. Attendance, actual contact hours, and engagement describe students’ participation. Diagnostics and tutor-rated mastery describe different aspects of academic progress and should be reported separately.
For each result, identify the students included, grade and subject, timeframe, assessment, and any missing records. Compare baseline and final scores only when the measure supports that comparison. Read outcomes alongside implementation data and the report’s limitations before making decisions.
See the Denver 2022–23 case study and Ohio statewide 2023–24 case study for report-specific measures and source reports.
Follow the instructional decisions that help students explain ideas, make connections, and use learning in new contexts.
See what Cignition looks for when selecting tutors and how selection, matching, and continued support differ.
START WITH THE NEED
Tell us about the students, schedule, and goals. We’ll help determine the model and whether Cignition is a fit.